Wednesday, August 24, 2016
I declared months ago that I will not be attending the Toronto Int'l Film Festival for my 12th year in a row. I'm already going to go to Toronto for the TIFF Soiree featuring Michael Fassbender on Wednesday, September 7th. However, I would like to explore possibly driving to Toronto, again, on Saturday so I can see Michael's film, Trespass Against Us, at 11:45am, as well as The Magnificent Seven, directed by the awesome Antoine Fuqua, and starring Denzel Washington at 2:30pm.
Try as I might to put all things TIFF out of my mind, I find myself wringing my hands slightly to see if there's a chance I can go there quickly, just to see two movies, and get out of town. Because I'm so close to Toronto, it's almost like a no brainer in determining if I should attend, especially on a Saturday! Well, individual tickets for the festival go on sale on Sunday, Sept 4th at 9am. If I can buy these two tickets, or just the one for Trespass, I will make it another fun one-day excursion to Toronto, and this will definitely be the LAST time I drive from Michigan to Toronto to attend the festival.
If it's meant to be, I'll be there.
Friday, August 19, 2016
|Nate Parker (middle) as Nat Turner in Birth of a Nation|
But that all came to a screeching halt last weekend when on a promotional interview, writer, director and actor of Birth, Nate Parker, candidly made reference to his past criminal investigation of a rape in 1999 while a student at Penn State. Although he was found not-guilty due to a technicality, basic information about this situation was on his wikipedia page for quite a while. But because Nate has been an actor who has been under the radar in the past 10 years of his acting/directing career, not a lot of people were aware of him, let alone the public records of his 'transgression' at Penn State in 1999. In what I believe was an attempt to be open and seemingly remorseful about his past, Nate opened this conversation up to a much wider public audience where 98% of us did not know about this rape case. Like most people, I'm not in the habit of when I first learn about a public figure, I don't go directly to his/her wikipedia page to learn more about them. I just read the general article that is written about them, and leave it at that. So it's not like this rape case was being suppressed or anything, the basic gist of it was there on his wikipedia page... but not the gory details, which are just now being shared to the rest of us who had no clue about the rape case period.
In the past several days, we've come to learn that Nate's writing partner, Jean Celestin, was also involved in the rape case. But unlike Nate, Jean was actually found guilty - but six months later, in a failed re-trial, he was exonerated. So now that's three brand new pieces of information to soil the film: 1. a rape, 2. friend found guilty but Nate off on a technicality, and 3. friend eventually exonerated. But as people become curious, disgusted and then more outraged about this new old information, more shovels come out to dig up more dirt. We come to learn that the technicality that got Nate cleared was only because he had a sexual encounter with the girl a day before. So yah, it's ok then to have sex with her unconscious body a day later! Not!
It gets worse. There is a phone transcript between the girl and Nate where she states how confused (she was drunk and blacked out) she was and curious as to how many more guys were in the room. Nate totally blew her off and made like she knew what was going down and he was very hesitant to let her know that Jean was part of the sexual encounter too. There was also a third guy involved. He was in the dorm room with Nate, Jean and the girl, and when he saw her unconscious body laying on the bed while Nate was having his way with her, he told authorities that Nate invited them both to join in! Jean joined in raping her, but the other guy left because he knew it was wrong and didn't want to have anything to do with it. For clarification, to me, a person is being raped when they are heavily drugged or intoxicated, and cannot freely agree to having sexual relations with one person... let alone a second person. Ok?
Reports from the case, and testimony from the girl lay bare how devastating this attack was to her. The young woman was already fragile having coming from a broken home, foster care, and battling depression. Even after dealing with such personal turmoil, she was very bright and was a straight A student. She worked two jobs, and had a scholarship to Penn State. She explained how she was so confused and scared about not knowing what happened to her that previous night as she woke up very sore and knew she had been raped. She was in such a physical state, she could not walk well and she said that her vagina was literally painful and felt like it was shredded. The Daily Beast wrote a most thorough, chilling, and compelling article about the entire case. Anyone with a hint of compassion for a rape victim will be terribly disturbed by the recounting of the events. The harassment that the victim experienced to keep her from testifying in the second trial is awful. It appears that the department of athletics at Penn State and students supporting Nate and Jean made life on campus for the girl unbearable, embarrassing, and under constant threat.
She attempted suicide twice within a 10 day period in late 2002-ish, but eventually fell down a self-destructed path of no return and died on her third suicide attempt in 2012. Her family states that the rape and the trial and the harassment destroyed her and lead to her killing herself. The stress and feeling of helplessness from her attack, broke her down mentally, and she was never able to recover.
Fortuitously, with Nate Parker bringing up this case in an effort to put it out there now and behind him as he prepares for Oscar season, we all now learn of the victim's fate, her death by suicide four years ago. This knowledge really pissed off people and added a new layer to this terrible saga. Apparently, the news of the victim's death came as a surprise to Nate, and he has written some lame ass soul cleansing post on his facebook. I don't care what the man has to say as I believe it's insincere. Based on what I know from public records of this case, he's an asshole who took advantage of a woman in the worst way, and left her in such a mental and physical state that she eventually killed herself years later.
|Nation could still do ok at the Oscars - because people need it to|
There are those who are compelled to still watch this film, and I do understand why because this is an important story that needs to be told and watched. People are anxious to see Nat Turner's story on the big screen - a long, long overdue account that again, needs to be told. Thus far the film has yet to receive outstanding critical praise, just very modest support. Yet again, another indication that this film is being handled with delicate gloves in order to position it to win big at the Oscars, in a shallow attempt to redeem the Oscars themselves from recent years of not valuing diversity in key award categories.
I cannot in good conscience support Birth of a Nation by going to see it, and I'll go a step further and write that I do not believe that this film should win Best Picture. I don't have much say or pull, but I think my sentiments are shared by a lot of people, especially those who are able to vote. Birth is also being positioned to be nominated in Directing and Actor for Nate. If the film were to overcome this PR nightmare, it would win just three years after 12 Years a Slave won Best Picture, another film about 19th century American slavery and the evils of that time. I personally wish that there was another type of American story about black life that was not related to slavery times in the position of being honored by the Oscars. But like those who make Halocaust films and documentaries, American slavery is a significant and horrific historical event that lasted over two hundred years (1619-1865) - much longer than the Halocaust in Europe; but these are stories that need to be told. However, the big major difference in a so called justification of the proliferation of Halocaust stories vs. American slavery stories, is that the Halocaust was a much more recent, and many actual survivors and some of the evil perpetrators are still alive. No American slaves or American slave owners are alive today... however, yes, the after effects of slavery itself still linger in this country at the detriment of many black Americans.
I want people to see Parker's Birth of a Nation if they want to, when it rolls out into theaters on October 7. I want Birth of a Nation to recoup its production costs - I don't want it to be an utter failure at the box office. And I want Nate Parker to eventually evolve and move on from his horrible actions of 1999. But I don't want him to be honored this year at the Oscars. I'm too disturbed by his actions from 17 years ago, and I think his actions are unforgivable as we are coming to learn the full extent of the sexual assault event. I don't hate Nate Parker, he is a flawed human being whose recent words appear false and lacking true humility. His words are designed only to protect the film's Oscar chances and to protect his legacy. But in the end, this is show business and the business end of it takes precedence, and Fox Searchlight is going to get their money back come hell or high water, and they will do whatever it takes to get at least one Oscar for this film. To that, I say, good luck, you'll need it because this week, Birth of a Nation's Oscar chances died.
Friday, August 5, 2016
I registered with Airbnb last year in anticipation of needing to use this service as I make plans to move to California. But as I was trying to set up my account, I was having huge difficulties in managing my profile and providing my credit card information. It was so bad, I was just about to cancel everything and walk away from using their services. However, I decided to reach out to their customer service to get their help. They were very helpful but puzzled by my problem to complete updating my profile. It took them almost a week to fix the problem, but they resolved the registration issue on my account. But, Airbnb went a step further, they apologized to me for the technical glitch and they gave me $100 credit to use towards my first booking. It was an extremely generous offer for an annoying situation and that made me really appreciative of how they respect their customer's time.
Well today I booked my first Airbnb reservation at a house in Los Angeles near Culver City/Venice. LA is a popular destination so if you want to use Airbnb, you need to book early. I am on an extremely tight budget so I had to find something within my $50/night range. I saw two places that were under $40, but one was literally a spare 'sofa' in a dark room, and the other was more like a hostel where they had bunkbeds in a large room. Look, even while I'm on a budget, I still have standards. However, I found this really cute room in a house for $53/night. I read the amenities, noted my preferred location in this vast city, and I read their cancelation policy. Everything else nearby was out of my budget range, and that's ok because I really got lucky in selecting this place.
The way Airbnb works is that people register with this company to host visitors to stay at their place. Some hosts have the bare minimum amenities for those on strict budgets, and others are quite luxurious. I'm smack dab in the middle. I get a private bed and bath in a 'cute and modern' home. So once you submit a request to stay at a place and the time you want to stay, the host will make the decision to accept your request or not. I almost forgot - it is extremely helpful to read the reviews of guests who stayed at properties, they can make or break your decision. Although the place I decided to stay at was new and had only six reviews, all six were 5-star reviews and the comments were very nice. To help the host decide to accept you, you're given the opportunity to write a message explaining your reason for visiting and needing a place to stay. Nice, simple and transparent. Not five minutes later, I get a text message from the host providing me with some updates about her home. I agreed and understood and in the next message, she approved me to stay. After applying my $100 credit to the payment, I only owed $102. Broken down for three nights, that is only $34 a night - totally within my budget!
The neat thing about staying at this particular residence is that it is only a 7 minute walk from an Enterprise car rental. I will rent a car so I can drive to my appointments, and of course, I got the most economical car. So, I'm really excited about my late September visit, which will be an opportunity for me to attend some important networking interview/meetings as well as check out places to live. Another cool thing about Airbnb is that most residences that host give a discount for monthly rentals. So that's something for me to think about as a temporary backup plan.
Thanks to those who have pledge thus far to make a donation by the end of my fundraiser. I really, really appreciate any donations made! xoxo
Monday, August 1, 2016
|Michigan has 3, 288 miles of freshwater coastline, the longest in the US|
With so many people all around the world using the Internet to raise money for a multitude of reasons and events, I truly believe that one must be transparent in the reason why they are asking for money, and to be careful to not permit the fundraising to get out of control to the point where integrity comes into question, and people wonder what you really have planned for that money. Also, there's lots of money to be made from the fundraiser sites that are supposedly designed to help people raise money. You have to read the fine print about the fees that are automatically deducted from those sites - it's in their best interest that a fundraiser does well enough that they profit off of it. So when I realized that my previous fundraiser venue had a questionable fee structure, I backed away from it as I didn't want to support their profits during the one public time I am seeking extra financial support.
I realize I may be opening myself up for ridicule, but you cannot get help without asking for it. At the top of the sidebar, I have a Paypal donation link. If you are so inclined to make a donation from Aug 1 - Sept 15, I would greatly appreciate it. Please let me know if you have any questions.
As I wrap up my final few months here in Michigan, I'm taking note of things that I'll be doing for the 'last time' in my home state. Like last weekend, I ventured to the Ann Arbor Art Fair. It was a perfect day, and I stuck to my budget of $25 to spend by buying a pretty hair wrap, and some gorgeously moisturizing goat milk soap! I'm checking out some of my favorite stores for fun walk through. Even though I will be visiting Michigan regularly, things change and sometimes stores close or move to a different area. Of all the cities in Michigan, Ann Arbor is the only one that I feel a genuine emotional connection with, and I'll miss it. But, like I said, I'll be back.
And although I announced months ago that I will not be attending the Toronto International Film Festival this year, I will attend a soiree just a day before the festival opens. It will be a quick one day trip to my beloved Toronto, but it will be worth it. When I left Pearson airport last month after my trip overseas, I believed then that it was my last time driving from Toronto back home to Michigan. Well, since this soiree event has been announced for September 7th, I will truly make one last round trip drive to Toronto from Michigan. The first drive I made was back in the late 90s, but prior to that, in the early 90s, I took the train. I will miss being so close to the coolest non-American, American city in the world. In the future when I attend TIFF, I'll be flying to it from Los Angeles.